l4rsen72的部落格

One of the furthermost serious challenges for general population relatives campaigns is distinguishing the factors that will really cause those to regulation their behaviors.

Much PR and hype is resolute on notice - fashioning relatives mindful of the dangers of a behavior, and/or sensible of the benefits of ever-changing.

But awareness water far momentary of affecting people's conduct. Otherwise, no one would smoke, overeat, party and drive, or actuation spell talking on a compartment phone. We all cognise the dangers of these behaviors, yet they continue. The statement to dynamic activity lies in understanding the "drivers" of behavior.

For example, when my PR unshakable initial started exploitable near the local adolescent safe-driving campaign, we researched teens and asked them, "When you actuation safely, what motivates you to do so?" Teens could say that they feared passing in a crash; or feared pain others. But overwhelmingly time of life aforesaid "fear of a ticket" impelled them to actuation safely. That's serious hearsay to have; instead than exasperating to worry young drivers beside doomsday and death, direction on the more contiguous outcome of feat a commercial document. Older adults mightiness be more impelled out of safety concerns, but for teens, who see themselves as immortal, safekeeping messages jump down on deaf-and-dumb ears. But many another teens have gotten a ticket, or cognize causal agent who has, and that effect is a more trenchant motivational driver. A puny superfluous research showed that the financial knock-on effect for one ticket can add up to $3,000 in fines and, more importantly, inflated security premiums.

So the key to influencing people's behaviour beside PR lies not so untold in the inventive lynching of a campaign, but in the front-end research to set the correct drivers of behavioral shift. Better research, higher outcomes.